According to the views expressed in the early 20th century by Bertrand Russell, Alfred Ayer, and others, the individual's perception of the
world around them is always skewed by the limitations of sensory data. In other words, an error free perception of
the world around us cannot technically be achieved because the data is tainted
during sensory interpretation. This view
is shared by Obi-Wan in Star Wars, as seen here:
His main point that “your eyes can deceive you, don’t trust
them” is part of a recurring theme in the saga.
This theme concerns the importance of not allowing oneself to waste their
effort processing and interpreting what they sense, but rather following
instinct and prior experience. Taking
this one step further, one could make the argument that such a theme begins
defining a difference between knowledge and wisdom. And there most definitely are differences. The way I look at it is that knowledge is the
memorization of data (can be gained by simply observing), while wisdom can only
be gained by making mistakes, and learning from them (refining one’s
instincts). That said however, instinct
alone does not make one “master of the force” as Star Wars suggests, but one
cannot function solely on sense-datum either.
And is there really no such thing as luck? Well that’s another story (see post on Ferris
Bueller).
The Star Wars light saber scene is a great example of the dubious information that the senses provide. Doubting the senses was the premise for Descartes' efforts to find some fundational truth.
ReplyDeleteI like Joe's connection to wisdom and luck.